As I read Chapter 8 I thought about
what I’ve taught my students about comprehension this year and what I’ve taught
my students about comprehension in the past.
I also reflected a lot on teaching SRA.
I can see how SRA can be beneficial to a small group of students but as
a whole group I did not know what all of my students were capable of. I know that when I used SRA my students were
able to word call and go back and find a few details about the story but they
were not able to dig deep into a story and make any meaning out of the stories.
In the past we used SRA as our
reading instruction and some students were great at word calling and had really
good grades while others did not do so well on the timed fluency checkouts and
daily worksheets. I felt that the
stories were not great to discuss or make inferences with. There was not much in the story so it was
hard to make connections or inferences with them. My students were not learning skills that
good readers need. They were not
learning the strategies that they needed for their future. Now we use balanced literacy and the students
are exposed to strategies that help them comprehend, read accurately, read
fluently, and expand their vocabulary on a daily basis. I can see that SRA could still be beneficial
to a small group of my students but my students this year seem to be on higher
reading levels than students in years past.
I am not trying to bash SRA but I am interested to see how this group of
students do in the future compared to past students who were not exposed to
“Comprehension, Accuracy, Fluency, and Expanding Vocabulary” during balanced
literacy every day.
I really like that Routman talked
about how important it is to for the teacher to model how he/she reads. I think we can show many strategies but we
need to show our students what we do as well.
I try to talk to them about strategies that I use when I read new books
and even how I pick out books. After
reading this chapter, I showed them this book and where I have sticky notes,
where I’ve highlighted, and where I wrote in the margins. I stressed that we do not do this unless the
books belongs to us but I wanted them to see what good readers do and that I
would be able to answer comprehension questions about what I read. I showed them how this would help me use what
I read and how it helped me become a better reader. Another thing that really stood out to me was
on page 118, Routman said “You can’t start teaching comprehension in grade
3. You start teaching it the day kids enter
preschool or kindergarten.” I think this
is so important and it helps our kids so much! As our school year comes closer
to the end, I hope my students will take these skills with them and use them in
the future
You raise a good question--what will the long-term outcomes of our readers be in workshop structures vs. scripted direct instruction? Sounds like a longitudinal experiment in the making at Arcadia! :-) And yes, teaching comprehension from Day 1 is so important. Thank you for teaching your readers to read for meaning, not just for words!
ReplyDeleteHi Jessica,
ReplyDeleteI agree with Routman that you can't wait to start comprehension. If we believe that reading is meaning, then everything we do has to be with the purpose of comprehension and in the context of real reading.