Blog #4 Routman (2003) Chapter 8:
Teach Comprehension- Rosie Vargas
For this blog I chose the chapter on
Teach Comprehension. I know that for me personally I often have to reread text
in order to comprehend it well. Just like the students I can read the words in
a paragraph and still question what it was about so I thought this would be a
good chapter to help improve comprehension. It happens too often when students
read a text flawlessly and can only state simple facts about the text but not
analyze it. I thought it was interesting that the author explains that perhaps
too much emphasis is given on word calling, automaticity and fluency in the
early grades often at the expense of true comprehension (Routman, 2003). I
think in our school with such a high percentage of ESOL students it is
important that we don’t mistake fluent readers with high comprehension readers.
In other word, simply because a student can
read words without mistakes it doesn’t mean they know the meaning of all the
words well enough to apply them to a deep level of comprehension. According to Routman,
another reason some students may not achieve full understanding is because they
lack the background, prior experiences, or knowledge of the way texts and
authors work. There have been many times where I have stopped a reading to show
an image or explain about a word in order to clarify meaning for the students.
This chapter has a lot of great
strategies that readers can use in order to become more proficient. The three
that I found most useful are; make connections; visualize and make inferences
(Routman, p.118). However, the text does
caution against excessive use of strategies and the amount of time spent
teaching all of them. Routman explains that students are spending large amounts
of time learning and practicing these strategies often without knowing how to
apply them. I learned that like most
things we must find a balance between teaching strategies and application. For
this Routman suggest a 20-percent to 80- percent rule: We learned that on
average, dedicating about one fifth of each period to explicit strategy
instruction was sufficient to provide students insight into comprehension
skills, which they then applied and extended in the remaining four fifths of
the period (Routman, p.120).
Lastly, from this reading I have
taken away that interacting with peers about what you read can help increase
comprehension and enjoyment. I think this is a great strategy for students because
they enjoy working with partners and getting a chance to talk to each other.
Routman suggest that we provide more opportunities for students to talk with
others about what they read through interactive reading, shared reading aloud, reciprocal
teaching, literature conversations and partner reading (Routman, p. 127). I’m
looking forward to reading more about ways to use these in the next chapters.
You make an excellent point--it IS very easy to confuse fluent readers with comprehending readers, but fluency does not always signify comprehension!! I love that 20/80 split too--it really reminds us that focused instruction should be a short time investment that will yield big returns once we give kids time to apply the strategy in real reading contexts.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your point Rosie, that we don't want to mistake fluent readers for readers who are comprehending everything they read. I also agree with Routman's 20%/80% suggested time allotment for teacher directed instruction and student application so that the majority of time is spent with students independently reading and writing. Thanks, Dawn
ReplyDelete